[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cfd18e0f0806240127y105d759aye6b60715e74b823@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:27:28 +0200
From: "Michael Kerrisk" <mtk.manpages@...glemail.com>
To: "Bart Van Assche" <bart.vanassche@...il.com>
Cc: "Roman Zippel" <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
"Michael Kerrisk" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"john stultz" <johnstul@...ibm.com>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: nanosleep() uses CLOCK_MONOTONIC, should be CLOCK_REALTIME?
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Bart Van Assche
<bart.vanassche@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 7:39 AM, Michael Kerrisk
> <mtk.manpages@...glemail.com> wrote:
>> I'll add some text (not quite sure what yet) in the nanosleep() man
>> page on this point.
>
> You could e.g. mention that nanosleep() is neither affected by the
> settimeofday() system call
Thanks. Yes, that follows fairly naturally from the statement about
clock_settime().
> nor by adjtimex() (this last one is used by
> ntpd).
That surprised me a little. So gradual adjustments to the time made
by adjtime() / adjtimex() really don't affect nanosleep()?
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
man-pages online: http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online_pages.html
Found a bug? http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists