[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200806241306.42054.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:06:41 +0200
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
To: Elias Oltmanns <eo@...ensachen.de>
Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IDE: Fix HDIO_DRIVE_RESET handling
On Tuesday 24 June 2008, Elias Oltmanns wrote:
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com> wrote:
[...]
> > BTW Your fix adds framework which can be re-used for fixing locking of
> >IDE
> > settings (+ it finally makes sense to dust-off my IDE settings rework which
> > was always low-prio and was never posted :) and maybe it could be also used
> > for drive->special handling.
>
> Alan's remark made me think again and I'm still not quite sure whether I
> can (and indeed should) fix ide_abort() and allow for out of band
[...]
I don't see a reliable way to fix ide_abort() - once the request/command
is started hardware can be already in a state that makes aborting hard if
not impossible.
Thanks,
Bart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists