[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080624115400.GF21890@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:54:00 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Hecht <dhecht@...are.com>, Tim Mann <mann@...are.com>,
Zach Amsden <zach@...are.com>, Sahil Rihan <srihan@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86:Use cpu_khz for loops_per_jiffy calculation
* Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 16:47 -0700, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com> wrote:
> >
> > > IMO, lpj_tsc explains how is this variable initialized. But thinking
> > > about it, maybe we should rename it to "lpj_timer" ?
> >
> > ok. But instead of 'lpj_timer' i'd suggest to use something like
> > 'lpj_fine' - as this really is about finegrained measurements.
>
> Ok.
> >
> > I'd suggest a delta patch against tip/master that renames all those
> > tsc_* variables to fine_*. So tsc_rate_min would become fine_rate_min,
> > etc.
>
> Ingo, tsc_rate_min etc are related to the timer rate so calling it
> fine_rate_min would be confusing IMO. Instead i call it as
> timer_rate_min. Below is the patch on tip/master. Tested on both 32
> and 64 bit environment, tree works fine for me.
applied to tip/x86/delay - thanks Alok.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists