[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080624092824.4f0440ca@bree.surriel.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 09:28:24 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] prevent incorrect oom under split_lru
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:31:54 +0900
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> if zone->recent_scanned parameter become inbalanceing anon and file,
> OOM killer can happened although swappable page exist.
>
> So, if priority==0, We should try to reclaim all page for prevent OOM.
You are absolutely right. Good catch.
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: b/mm/vmscan.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1464,8 +1464,10 @@ static unsigned long shrink_zone(int pri
> * kernel will slowly sift through each list.
> */
> scan = zone_page_state(zone, NR_LRU_BASE + l);
> - scan >>= priority;
> - scan = (scan * percent[file]) / 100;
> + if (priority) {
> + scan >>= priority;
> + scan = (scan * percent[file]) / 100;
> + }
> zone->lru[l].nr_scan += scan + 1;
> nr[l] = zone->lru[l].nr_scan;
> if (nr[l] >= sc->swap_cluster_max)
>
--
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists