linux-kernel - Re: RT-Scheduler/cgroups: Possible overuse of resources assigned via cpu.rt_period_us and cpu.rt_runtime

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <486125E5.7020209@qualcomm.com>
Date:	Tue, 24 Jun 2008 09:50:45 -0700
From:	Max Krasnyanskiy <maxk@...lcomm.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:	"Daniel K." <dk@...no>, mingo@...e.hu,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>,
	Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
Subject: Re: RT-Scheduler/cgroups: Possible overuse of resources assigned
 via cpu.rt_period_us and cpu.rt_runtime_us

Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 23:14 -0700, Max Krasnyansky wrote:
> 
>> That seems too complicated :). There is no need to mount them separately.
> 
> Mounting them independently gives you much greater flexibility.
> 
> You quickly run into overlapping cpu sets if you want multiple groups on
> the isolated part.

Sure, it is more flexible but for simple cases it's more confusing.

Max
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/