[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1214327453.6563.14.camel@lts-notebook>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:10:53 -0400
From: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] putback_lru_page()/unevictable page handling
rework v3
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 11:43 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> Hi
>
> > I merged kamezawa-san's SHMEM related fix.
> > this patch works well >2H.
> > and, I am going to test on stress workload during this week end.
> >
> > but I hope recieve review at first.
> > thus I post it now.
>
> Unfortunately, my machine crashed last night ;-)
> I'll dig it.
I ran 26-rc5-mm3 with 5 split/unevictable lru patches that you posted on
19june. I replaced patch 5 of that series with the subject patch
[rework v3, merged SHMEM fix]. This kernel ran my 'usex' stress load
overnight for 23+ hours on both ia64 and x86_64 platforms with no
problems. I evidently did not hit the problem you did.
I'm rebuilding with a patch to a small problem that I discovered along
with your recent patch to "prevent incorrect oom...". I'll let you know
how that goes as well.
I'll send along two additional patches shortly.
Lee
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists