[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1214329708.6563.43.camel@lts-notebook>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:48:28 -0400
From: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix to putback_lru_page()/unevictable page handling
rework v3
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 02:35 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > 'lru' was not being set to 'UNEVICTABLE when page was, in fact,
> > unevictable [really "nonreclaimable" :-)], so retry would never
> > happen, and culled pages never counted.
> >
> > Also, redundant mem_cgroup_move_lists()--one with incorrect 'lru',
> > in the case of unevictable pages--messes up memcontroller tracking [I think].
>
> indeed.
> sorry, I forgot to send this fix.
>
> Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
>
> but I still happend panic on usex and nishimura-san's cpuset migration test.
> -> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=121375647720110&w=2
>
I saw the description of the cpuset migration test. Have you wrapped
this in a script suitable for running under usex? If so, I would like
to get a copy. Actually, please send me any automation you have for
this test and I'll incorporate it into the usex load. Meanwhile, I'll
take a cut at adding such a test to the load. However, we know that
your version can provoke the panic, so I'd like to get that.
>
> I'll investigate it tommorow.
Later, then,
Lee
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists