[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080624211547.GB27452@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 23:15:47 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug #10815] 2.6.26-rc4: RIP find_pid_ns+0x6b/0xa0
* Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > Also Core 2 Duo, x86_64 [1]
> > >
> > > Race is wide -- 60 seconds of rcutorture is enough.
>
> This is rcutorture by itself, or in parallel with LTP/kernbench?
>
> (I have mostly been running on 4-CPU boxes without failure either way,
> so will try a dual-CPU box.)
FYI, i've been running rcutorture for days on lots of testboxes ranging
all across the x86 spectrum from single CPU, through dual-core, to
dual-socket, dual-socket HT, 8-way and 16-way - both 32-bit and 64-bit
x86.
Not a single failure has been detected in thousands of bootups of random
kernels (rcu-preempt + rcutorture was a frequent combination tested). I
added a WARN_ON() to rcutorture failures so it should show up very
clearly.
This makes me suspect that it might be some special environment issue -
gcc for example. I'm using gcc 4.2.2 on most of the testboxes.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists