[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0806232004480.2926@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:07:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
cc: "Mark M. Hoffman" <mhoffman@...htlink.com>,
Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>,
Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@....nl>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
lm-sensors@...sensors.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.26-rc] ACPI Thermal Zone driver breaks lm-sensors 2
userspace
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Robert Hancock wrote:
> Mark M. Hoffman wrote:
> >
> > 1) The bug is in libsensors (2.10), not the kernel.
>
> This doesn't matter. Breaking userspace in such a fashion is severely frowned
> upon unless essentially unavoidable, even if it is just triggering a bug.
I do tend to agree. If it used to work, it should continue to work, even
if it wasn't _meant_ to work.
That's not always 100% possible, but the fact is, neither is updating user
space always possible. The kernel needs to try its best to maintain stable
interfaces, and no, "..but the interface was broken" is _not_ an
acceptable excuse for unbreaking it if it causes problems.
> > - but more importantly -
> >
> > 2) This patch is broken.
>
> You didn't indicate what was wrong with the patch.
Yes. Leaving everybody wondering whether it's just an opinionated
expression of the former problem, or whether there is a real and
understandable reason why it was NACK'ed.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists