linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ACPI: don't walk tables if ACPI was disabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080625070740.GA8506@elte.hu>
Date:	Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:07:40 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc:	Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@...el.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@...e.de>,
	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: don't walk tables if ACPI was disabled


* Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org> wrote:

> > > and now I understand the purpose of the check; pnpbios does not 
> > > depend on ACPI; ACPI/pnpacpi is incompatible with pnpbios.
> > 
> > wow, rather old bug - i guess lockdep made it more visible.
> 
> No, that commit was not a bug, it was correct, and still is, for 
> pnpACPI and pnpBIOS must be mutually exclusive.
> 
> The thing that changed was the RTC specific code.

ok. Vegard's patch/workaround got my test setup going, i'll drop it if 
something better comes along. (tip/out-of-tree commits dont get 
propagated into linux-next so it will not interfere with anything)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/