[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0806250900240.3297@apollo.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:09:39 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...glemail.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: When did High-Resolution Timers hit mainline?
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> High-Resolution Timers
> Before Linux 2.6.16, the accuracy of timer and sleep system
> calls (see below) was also limited by the size of the jiffy.
>
> Since Linux 2.6.16, Linux supports high-resolution timers
> (HRTs), optionally configurable since kernel 2.6.21 via CON-
> FIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS. On a system that supports HRTs, the accu-
> racy of sleep and timer system calls is no longer constrained
> by the jiffy, but instead can be as accurate as the hardware
> allows (microsecond accuracy is typical of modern hardware).
Hmm, that's a bit backwards. We changed the internal handling of those
interfaces to hrtimers in 2.6.16, but the accuracy is still jiffies
unless you have CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS enabled (which is only possible
as of 2.6.21) and your system provides the necessary hardware.
> HRTs are not supported on all hardware architectures. (Support
> is provided on x86, arm, and powerpc, among others.)
Also you might point out that you can check whether high resolution
timers are active via clock_getres() or by checking the resolution
entry in /proc/timer_list.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists