[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.1.10.0806251034330.4593@jikos.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:37:37 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llipavsky@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] module: make symbol_put_addr() work for all exported
symbols
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Rusty Russell wrote:
> It might be better to centralize all these iterators, and create a
> proper iterator function. Any chance you could rewrite it on top of
> this patch? (Lightly tested)
Hi Rusty,
yes, this looks like better approach. I will respin that patch.
> +struct find_symbol_arg
> +{
> + /* Input */
> + const char *name;
> + bool gplok;
> + bool warn;
> +
> + /* Output */
> + struct module *owner;
> + const unsigned long *crc;
> + unsigned long value;
> +};
I see two options how to do this -- either I can make 'value' input
parameter too, so that find_symbol_in_section() could perform lookup
either according to address or according to name (whatever is specified in
the passed struct find_symbol_arg), or I can do a completely new lookup
function for address-wise lookups. What would you prefer? I don't have any
strong preference either way.
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists