[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48621E83.3060608@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 06:31:31 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
CC: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ben-linux@...ff.org
Subject: Re: Removal of BAST IDE driver
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> series) so when later Jeff merged:
>
> commit cc18e0fea7907e7a96b7df71b81838d518bc074e
> Author: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>
> Date: Mon Jun 16 12:16:26 2008 +0100
>
> LIBATA: Add HAVE_PATA_PLATFORM to select PATA_PLATFORM driver
> ...
>
> which was patch #1/2 in the series I was under impression that now we
> have both new and old driver with the old driver being the default because
> of the link order. Seems I was wrong after all as other things are moving
> slower than IDE/ATA. ;)
>
> Sorry for messing things up. Russell/Ben: how should we proceed with
> fixing it (arch part in or ide part out)?
Ben's change merely adds a knob that a platform may set, in order to
enable the existing pata_platform driver, which is pretty safe by itself.
The next piece -- once not in 2.6.26 AFAIK -- is arch-specific code
selecting HAVE_PATA_PLATFORM. BAST IDE, I assume, can go away once
relevant platforms start turning on HAVE_PATA_PLATFORM.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists