[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080625141242.GA27389@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:12:42 +0400
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -rt] ide: fix interrupts processing issue with
preempt-able hardirqs
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 01:32:57PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > The bug, as I see it, in the alim15x3 (ULi M5228) hardware: for some
> > reason it does not hold IRQ line, but rises it for some short period
> > of time (while the drive itself rises and holds it correctly -- I'm
> > seeing it via oscilloscope).
>
> Are you sure the kernel isn't touching the status register and so
> clearing the IRQ condition at the controller ?
There are lots of places that reads status register, and looking into
the code flow I don't see any problem with the code.
But to be sure I inserted a printk into INB, and I don't see any status
reads when/after the drive asserts its IRQ.
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@...il.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists