linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ACPI: don't walk tables if ACPI was disabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0806242240050.3014@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:41:27 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@...el.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@...e.de>,
	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: don't walk tables if ACPI was disabled



On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> * Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 11:27 PM, Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com> wrote:
> > > So I guess this function, pnpbios_init() needs the check as well. In
> > > fact, it has this:
> > >
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_PNPACPI
> > >        if (!acpi_disabled && !pnpacpi_disabled) {
> > >                pnpbios_disabled = 1;
> > >                printk(KERN_INFO "PnPBIOS: Disabled by ACPI PNP\n");
> > >                return -ENODEV;
> > >        }
> > > #endif                          /* CONFIG_ACPI */
> > >
> > > ...I guess that should be changed to say if (acpi_disabled ||
> > > pnpacpi_disabled)? Or... I don't understand the purpose of the
> > > original test. But it seems to be there since the beginning of time
> > > (or, well, v2.6.12-rc2).
> > 
> > Nope. I found the introduction of the change in the historical git repository:
> > 
> > commit 4723ebe898a32262ed49fe677897ccea47e72ff4
> > Author: Adam Belay <ambx1@....rr.com>
> > Date:   Sun Oct 24 15:07:32 2004 -0400
> > 
> >     [PNPBIOS] disable if ACPI is active
> > 
> >     As further ACPI pnp functionaility is implemented it is no longer
> >     safe to run ACPI and PNPBIOS concurrently.
> > 
> >     We therefore take the following approach:
> >     - attempt to enable ACPI support
> >     - if ACPI fails (blacklist etc.) enable pnpbios support
> >     - if ACPI support is not compiled in the kernel enable pnpbios support
> > 
> >     Signed-off-by: Adam Belay <ambx1@....rr.com>
> > 
> > and now I understand the purpose of the check; pnpbios does not depend 
> > on ACPI; ACPI/pnpacpi is incompatible with pnpbios.
> 
> wow, rather old bug - i guess lockdep made it more visible.

No, that commit was not a bug, it was correct, and still is,
for pnpACPI and pnpBIOS must be mutually exclusive.

The thing that changed was the RTC specific code.

-Len
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/