linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6] futex: fix miss ordered wakeups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1214406451.24356.13.camel@lappy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:07:31 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] futex: fix miss ordered wakeups

On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 07:36 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 07:29 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > Daniel, I'm not sure what to think,.. you were told how broken this
> > approach was, you were told to give proper justification for this
> > change. You did neither and just reposted the same old broken shite
> > again.
> 
> Broken approach ? Never heard that before, 

I suggest you re-read some of Thomas' emails from last time...

  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/12/275

> in fact the problem is
> whether or not the changes are needed (not weather their broken).. I
> gave justification in the last thread, and I'm not sure why it's unclear
> to you..

You failed to convince, also justification goes in the changelog, not in
random lkml threads.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/