linux-kernel - Re: [-mm][PATCH 0/10] memory related bugfix set for 2.6.26-rc5-mm3 v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1214406571.7010.21.camel@lts-notebook>
Date:	Wed, 25 Jun 2008 11:09:31 -0400
From:	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
To:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [-mm][PATCH 0/10]  memory related bugfix set for
	2.6.26-rc5-mm3 v2

On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 18:59 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> Hi, Andrew and mm guys!
> 
> this is mm related fixes patchset for 2.6.26-rc5-mm3 v2.
> 
> Unfortunately, this version has several bugs and 
> some bugs depend on each other.
> So, I collect, sort, and fold these patchs.
> 
> 
> btw: I wrote "this patch still crashed" last midnight.
> but it works well today.
> umm.. I was dreaming?

Yes.  I ran my stress load with Nishimura-san's cpuset migration test on
x86_64 and ia64 platforms overnight.  I didn't have all of the memcgroup
patches applied--just the unevictable lru related patches.  Tests ran
for ~19 hours--including 70k-80k passes through the cpuset migration
test--until I shut them down w/o error.  

OK, I did see two oom kills on the ia64.  My stress load was already
pretty close to edge, but they look suspect because I still had a couple
of MB free on each node according to the console logs.  The system did
seem to choose a reasonable task to kill, tho'--a memtoy test that locks
down 10s of GB of memory.

> 
> Anyway, I believe this patchset improve robustness and
> provide better testing baseline.
> 
> enjoy!

I'll restart the tests with this series.

> 
> 
> Andrew, this patchset is my silver-spoon.
> if you like it, I'm glad too.
> 
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/