[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080625161914.GB20236@2ka.mipt.ru>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:19:15 +0400
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: jens.axboe@...cle.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
hugh@...itas.com, nickpiggin@...oo.com.au
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] mm: dont clear PG_uptodate in invalidate_complete_page2()
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 06:02:43PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi (miklos@...redi.hu) wrote:
> > I do not know fuse good enough, but it looks like if your patch only
> > fixes issue for pages which are in splice buffer during invalidation,
> > any subsequent call for splice() will get correct new data (at least
> > invoke readpage(s)), but in the description of error there was a
> > long timeout between reading and writing, so it was a fresh splice()
> > call, which suddenly started to return errors.
> >
> > Is it possible that by having uptodate bit in place, but page was
> > actually freed but not removed from all trees and so on, so it
> > masked read errors? This may be not the right conclusion though :)
>
> No, the mechanics of the problem are well understood. Only the
> solution is problematic :)
Then why not fix filesystems to set error bit on all broken reads, if
you sure it is the case?
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists