[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <486282A8.5020306@sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:38:48 -0700
From: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Merge setup_32/64.c into setup.c
Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>> * Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> include/asm-x86/setup.h | 2
>>>>> 5 files changed, 670 insertions(+), 934 deletions(-)
>>>> very nice!
>>>>
>>>> could we please split this up into several, gradual steps that bring
>>>> setup_32.c and setup_64.c to exactly the same content - where the final
>>>> patch just renames arch/x86/kernel/setup_32.c to arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
>>>> and deletes arch/x86/kernel/setup_64.c ?
>>> OK, someone (Mike Triavis) already stole setup.c for X86_NUMA.
>>>
>>> You need to change that setup.c to other name. or split it away...
>> hm, that change was supposed to be the seed of a unification. So if it
>> actually hinders you, feel free to move it to a different file.
>> Obviously it is setup_32.c and setup_64.c that should be unified into
>> setup.c.
>
> ok, I will change that setup_percpu.c
>
> YH
One thing I was trying to do was to merge more stuff from setup_32/64 into
setup.c. Unfortunately, there was some test failures on i386 that I did not
have time to debug. But the file existed before my time. ;-)
Why does the current setup.c need to be renamed and not simply add the merged
changes into it?
Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists