| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <486289A8.1040702@keyaccess.nl> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:08:40 +0200 From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl> To: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com> CC: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: regression, 2.6.26-rc7, pnp: quirk_system_pci_resources() On 24-06-08 17:17, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > I think your patch makes sense, and you can add my ack. Thank you, done. I used pnp_resource_type_name() from your patches... > I do have the feeling that the reason we need the quirk is because we > aren't handling those PNP device resources quite correctly in the > first place. But I don't have any good ideas about what's wrong yet. > > My first thought was that those regions might be marked as > ACPI_PRODUCER resources (i.e., the PNP device forwards transactions > in that region to a downstream device). In that case, the PNP device > is really a bridge, and it shouldn't reserve the region (or at least > should not mark it as busy). But I think we currently ignore > ACPI_PRODUCER resources completely, so I don't see how that could > cause this problem. I'm not up on the ACPI side of things at least, but am available for any testing you'd like me to do. Just say the word. Rene. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists