linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6] futex: fix miss ordered wakeups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1214423886.21035.66.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:58:05 -0700
From:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] futex: fix miss ordered wakeups


On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 21:06 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Unifying the mutex and the rtmutex blocked_on is semantically correct
> and is a worthwhile thing to do, but adding the futex waiter to it is
> simply a semantical brain fart which can not be excused by reducing
> the size of task struct.

I can unify just the rtmutex and the mutex, then add the futex waiter as
another entity.

Daniel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/