linux-kernel - Re: [patch 07/21] Cleanup sclp printk messages.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1214465176.12809.2.camel@localhost>
Date:	Thu, 26 Jun 2008 09:26:16 +0200
From:	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To:	Bastian Blank <bastian@...di.eu.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 07/21] Cleanup sclp printk messages.

On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 17:15 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 04:35:06PM +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > +	if (finished_sccb != (u32) (addr_t) sclp_init_sccb)
> > +		panic("sclp: unsolicited interrupt for buffer at 0x%x\n",
> > +		      finished_sccb);
> 
> Does that really need to be a panic?

Yes, that should be a panic. The point is that we got an unsolicited
interrupt from sclp at boot time. That means that there has been an sclp
request around from the last incarnation of the system. An sclp request
can do a lot of things, in particular it can change memory. Not a good
start for the new system ..

-- 
blue skies,
  Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/