[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080626104524.2d7ed1ab@halley.suse.de>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:45:24 +0200
From: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de>
To: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
yhlu.kernel@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add /sys/firmware/memmap
* Mikael Pettersson [2008-06-26 10:13]:
>
> Vivek Goyal writes:
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 09:57:05PM +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote:
> > > This patch adds /sys/firmware/memmap interface that represents the BIOS
> > > (or Firmware) provided memory map. The tree looks like:
> > >
> > > /sys/firmware/memmap/0/start (hex number)
> > > end (hex number)
> > > type (string)
> > > ... /1/start
> > > end
> > > type
> > >
> > > With the following shell snippet one can print the memory map in the same form
> > > the kernel prints itself when booting on x86 (the E820 map).
> > >
> > > --------- 8< --------------------------
> > > #!/bin/sh
> > > cd /sys/firmware/memmap
> > > for dir in * ; do
> > > start=$(cat $dir/start)
> > > end=$(cat $dir/end)
> > > type=$(cat $dir/type)
> > > printf "%016x-%016x (%s)\n" $start $[ $end +1] "$type"
> > > done
> > > --------- >8 --------------------------
> > >
> > > That patch only provides the needed interface:
> > >
> > > 1. The sysfs interface.
> > > 2. The structure and enumeration definition.
> > > 3. The function firmware_map_add() and firmware_map_add_early()
> > > that should be called from architecture code (E820/EFI, for
> > > example) to add the contents to the interface.
> > >
> > > If the kernel is compiled without CONFIG_FIRMWARE_MEMMAP, the interface does
> > > nothing without cluttering the architecture-specific code with #ifdef's.
> > >
> >
> > Hi Bernhard,
> >
> > Thanks for the patch. Couple of thoughts.
> >
> > Do we really need another CONFIG option (CONFIG_FIRMWARE_MEMMAP)? To,
> > me this does not seem to be a big chunk of code
>
> It should be configurable. Whether it's done via CONFIG_KEXEC or its own
> option I don't care.
Ok, changed:
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/Kconfig b/drivers/firmware/Kconfig
index 1008737..73fcc59 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/firmware/Kconfig
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ config EDD_OFF
config FIRMWARE_MEMMAP
def_bool y
- depends on X86_64 || X86_32
+ depends on (X86_64 || X86_32) && KEXEC
config EFI_VARS
tristate "EFI Variable Support via sysfs"
I will wait with resending the patch for other feedback.
Bernhard
--
Bernhard Walle, SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Architecture Development
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists