[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080626113855.GE29619@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:38:55 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Cc: Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@...all.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.26-rc: x86: pci-dma.c: use __GFP_NO_OOM instead of
__GFP_NORETRY
* Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org> wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 10, 2008 3:23 am Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@...all.net> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 12:15 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > * Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@...all.net> wrote:
> > > > > Okay, so how about this then ?
> > > >
> > > > applied to tip/pci-for-jesse for more testing. Thanks,
> > >
> > > I've thought about it a bit more, and I think the actual patch that
> > > really does what everybody wants is this one instead:
> >
> > applied a delta patch version of the one below to tip/pci-for-jesse.
>
> Speaking of that branch, how do you want to handle it? Is it intended
> for my linux-next branch or are some of the fixes important to get
> upstream now? Which branch should I diff/log against to see the
> changes (last time I looked it appeared neither master nor tip were
> the correct ones...)
that branch is always based in -git so if stuff goes upstream patches
disappear from it. git-log linus/master..tip/pci-for-jesse should tell
the currently pending items. Right now it's just two lowprio items:
Yinghai Lu (2):
pci: debug extra pci resources range
pci: debug extra pci bus resources
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists