linux-kernel - Re: Scatter-gather list constraints

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080626130034.GX20851@kernel.dk>
Date:	Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:00:34 +0200
From:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
	stern@...land.harvard.edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	antonio.lin@...ormicro.com, david.vrabel@....com
Subject: Re: Scatter-gather list constraints

On Thu, Jun 26 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> > On the fs side, just setting a hw block size of 1k should fix the
> > problem, since that'd be your minimum transfer size AND alignment there
> > even for O_DIRECT IO.
> 
> XFS used to force 512 byte IOs for its log IO. Not sure
> that was ever fixed. If it was fixed it likely required a disk format
> change (I think s390 ran into a problem like this)

Issuing IO less than the hardware block size is illegal, so if they do
that then they can't be supported on hardware with > 512b block sizes.
Someone has to do the RMW for such an operation and we don't do it in
drivers.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/