linux-kernel - Re: [-mm][PATCH 10/10] putback_lru_page()/unevictable page handling rework v4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080626103000.FCFC.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:31:31 +0900
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, Lee.Schermerhorn@...com, riel@...hat.com,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [-mm][PATCH 10/10] putback_lru_page()/unevictable page handling rework v4

> And that's kind-of OK.  It's messy, but we could live with it.  However
> as I expect there will be more fixes to these patches before all this
> work goes into mainline, this particular patch will become more of a
> problem as it will make the whole body of work more messy and harder to
> review and understand.
> 
> So.  Can this patch be simplified in any way?  Or split up into
> finer-grained patches or something like that?

Yes, sir!
I'll do it.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/