linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 48/60] microblaze_v4: headers simple files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:38:32 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc:	monstr@...nam.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, stephen.neuendorffer@...inx.com,
	John.Linn@...inx.com, john.williams@...alogix.com, matthew@....cx,
	will.newton@...il.com, drepper@...hat.com,
	microblaze-uclinux@...e.uq.edu.au, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, vapier.adi@...il.com,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, hpa@...or.com,
	Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 48/60] microblaze_v4: headers simple files - empty or redirect to asm-generic

On Thursday 26 June 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The comment could be nuked (as well as the #ifdef __KERNEL__), but for 
> the one #define an asm-generic header would IMHO be overkill.

I agree that it doesn't technically make sense to have a one-line
asm-generic header, but I like the idea of reducing the number of
asm/*.h files that actually contain anything other that
#include <asm-generic/$FILE.h>, mostly for documentation purposes.

If we can eventually agree on a way to get rid of the requirement
for explicit redirection, we can remove a larger number of source
files completely.

	Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/