[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200806260228.38674.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 02:28:38 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 25
On Wednesday, 25 of June 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi,
> Changes since next-20080624:
>
> The tip-core tree gained three conflicts against Linus' tree.
>
> The sched tree gained a conflict against the cpus4096 tree.
>
> The x86 tree gained a conflict against the ftrace tree. It also required
> three patches that Ingo supplied.
>
> The pci tree gained two conflicts against the x86 tree.
>
> The v4l-dvb tree has had another commit reverted for a build problem,
> however that may have been due to a mismerge in yesterday's tree.
>
> The acpi tree gained two conflicts against the x86 tree.
>
> The tests tree gained a conflict against the sched tree.
>
> The vfs tree gained a conflict against the sched tree.
>
> The rr tree gained a conflict against each of the sched and powerpc
> trees. It also required a patch and a commit reverted for build problems.
>
> The pcmcia tree lost its conflict against Linus' tree.
This tree is completely broken on my test box (x86-64 HP nx6325) and I can't
even bisect it. :-(
It hits a NULL pointer dereference in find_symbol during boot, but when I tried
to bisect this issue, I hit another one that made the box hang solid during
boot (early, no messages available).
If things continue going this way, 2.6.27 will be a disaster ...
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists