[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0806261756160.32336@blonde.site>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:13:02 +0100 (BST)
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
cc: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25.6 kernel BUG at mm/highmem.c:319!
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:59:42 -0400
> Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > Anyone know how this can happen ?
> > We just got a report from a user who is hitting the
> >
> > BUG_ON(!PageHighMem(page));
> >
> > in set_page_address().
>
> we discussed this 2 or 3 weeks ago as part of the kerneloops reports...
> everyone is puzzled... it's the number 20 report right now.
>
> http://www.kerneloops.org/search.php?search=set_page_address
>
> it seems that fuse is a very popular module when this hits...
I'm as puzzled now as back then. And fuse isn't in Dave's list.
But I did notice after reporting back on it, that i915 appears in all
of the reports I looked at; and Fedora does have some drm/i915
patches, which do involve kmap.
I know precious little about drm, but didn't spot anything in those
patches which was likely to cause this: they might be a good place
for Dave to start looking though.
If this user is suffering from it repeatedly, might s/he be prepared
to run a kernel with more debug in it? Though at this moment,
I don't know what it is that I'd like to be looking for anyway -
it's always easier to come up with debug patches when you've a
hypothesis as to what's going on, which I don't have.
Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists