[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4863E8F2.5080608@seznam.cz>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:07:30 +0200
From: Michal Simek <monstr@...nam.cz>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
stephen.neuendorffer@...inx.com, John.Linn@...inx.com,
john.williams@...alogix.com, matthew@....cx, will.newton@...il.com,
drepper@...hat.com, microblaze-uclinux@...e.uq.edu.au,
grant.likely@...retlab.ca, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
vapier.adi@...il.com, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, hpa@...or.com,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 58/60] microblaze_v4: sys_microblaze.c
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * sys_ipc() is the de-multiplexer for the SysV IPC calls..
>> + *
>> + * This is really horribly ugly.
>> + */
>
> If it's so horribly ugly, don't do it this way ;-)
:-) this is not my part of code. I'll remove it with syscall changes.
>> +int
>> +sys_ipc(uint call, int first, int second, int third, void *ptr, long fifth)
>> +{
>> + int version, ret;
>> +
>> + version = call >> 16; /* hack for backward compatibility */
>> + call &= 0xffff;
>
> Backwards compatibility with what?
I don't know.
John: I suppose this is your comment.
>> +static inline unsigned long
>> +do_mmap2(unsigned long addr, size_t len,
>> + unsigned long prot, unsigned long flags,
>> + unsigned long fd, unsigned long pgoff)
>> +{
>> + struct file *file = NULL;
>> + int ret = -EBADF;
>> +
>> + flags &= ~(MAP_EXECUTABLE | MAP_DENYWRITE);
>> + if (!(flags & MAP_ANONYMOUS))
>> + if (!(file = fget(fd))) {
>> + printk(KERN_INFO "no fd in mmap\r\n");
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + down_write(¤t->mm->mmap_sem);
>> + ret = do_mmap_pgoff(file, addr, len, prot, flags, pgoff);
>> + up_write(¤t->mm->mmap_sem);
>> + if (file)
>> + fput(file);
>> +out:
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +unsigned long sys_mmap2(unsigned long addr, size_t len,
>> + unsigned long prot, unsigned long flags,
>> + unsigned long fd, unsigned long pgoff)
>> +{
>> + return do_mmap2(addr, len, prot, flags, fd, pgoff);
>> +}
>> +
>> +unsigned long sys_mmap(unsigned long addr, size_t len,
>> + unsigned long prot, unsigned long flags,
>> + unsigned long fd, off_t offset)
>> +{
>> + int err = -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + if (offset & ~PAGE_MASK) {
>> + printk(KERN_INFO "no pagemask in mmap\r\n");
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + err = do_mmap2(addr, len, prot, flags, fd, offset >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>> +out:
>> + return err;
>> +}
>
> Which mmap is uClibc really using? I suppose you only need mmap2, even for
> compatibility with any binary ever built for microblaze.
I don't know. Microblaze should be compiled with uClibc and glibc. In case you
need mmap2 for uClibc and mmap for glibc it is ok.
M
> Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists