[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48631A01.1020009@skyrush.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:24:33 -0600
From: Joe Peterson <joe@...rush.com>
To: free_beer_for_all@...oo.com
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UTC timestamp option for FAT filesystems
barry bouwsma wrote:
> I think 100% of it refers to GMT+2
> (in my present time zone), so I wonder if in different languages,
> there's a preference for casual use of the phrase GMT (a quick
> look in my dictionary shows an entry for GMT, nothing for UTC,
> but then, it has no entry for `operating system' or its translated
> equivalent.
Well, your question certainly prompted me to go and read up on it again.
In my work (unmanned space missions - solar system stuff), we deal with
many representations of time, and so I am used to being anal about it.
For example, there is GMT, UTC, TDT, ET, etc. They all differ ever so
slightly.
> --- /mnt/usr/local/src/linux-2.6.24/fs/fat/inode.c-DIST 2008-01-30 10:59:19.000000000 +0100
> +++ /mnt/usr/local/src/linux-2.6.24/fs/fat/inode.c 2008-04-13 07:09:10.000000000 +0200
> @@ -826,6 +829,9 @@ static int fat_show_options(struct seq_f
> seq_puts(m, ",showexec");
> if (opts->sys_immutable)
> seq_puts(m, ",sys_immutable");
> +/* XXX HACK */
> + if (opts->utc)
> + seq_puts(m, ",utc");
> if (!isvfat) {
> if (opts->dotsOK)
> seq_puts(m, ",dotsOK=yes");
>
Indeed! Thanks, I'll put this in the patch. The above is actually not
needed for the mount command or /etc/mtab, but it *is* used for, e.g.,
/proc/mounts.
-Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists