linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for June 13: IO APIC breakage on HP nx6325

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200806262152.02099.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:52:00 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc:	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 13: IO APIC breakage on HP nx6325

On Saturday, 21 of June 2008, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 02:09:00AM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> 
> >  Meanwhile we may consider implementing a workaround.  I think one that 
> > does not hurt competent vendors would be preferable.  The DSDT containing 
> > the rubbish described here is marked with an OEM ID: "HP    " and OEM 
> > Table ID: "SB400".  These keys could be used to remove IRQ0 information
> > from the IRQ tables.  Our code is prepared to handle such a case.  
> > Something easy to do for a seasoned ACPI fiddler, I suppose. ;)
> 
> Something roughly like the following? Entirely untested, my 6125 is in a 
> box somewhere. My recollection is that skip_timer_override will disable 
> the IRQ 0->2 mapping, which I believe is what's broken here?

Well, actually, I'm not sure that will work.  I have only found
acpi_skip_timer_override being set to 1 in two places, but it doesn't seem to
be read anywhere.  What am I missing?


> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> index 33c5216..6ca5eff 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> @@ -1060,6 +1060,16 @@ static int __init force_acpi_ht(const struct dmi_system_id *d)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC
> +static int __init force_skip_timer_override(const struct dmi_system_id *d)
> +{
> +	printk(KERN_NOTICE "%s detected: disabling timer overrides",
> +	       d->ident);
> +	acpi_skip_timer_override = 1;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  /*
>   * If your system is blacklisted here, but you find that acpi=force
>   * works for you, please contact acpi-devel@...rceforge.net
> @@ -1227,6 +1237,24 @@ static struct dmi_system_id __initdata acpi_dmi_table[] = {
>  		     DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "TravelMate 360"),
>  		     },
>  	 },
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC
> +	{
> +	 .callback = force_skip_timer_override,
> +	 .ident = "HP NX6125 laptop",
> +	 .matches = {
> +		     DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "Hewlett-Packard"),
> +		     DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "HP Compaq nx6125"),
> +		     },
> +	 },
> +	{
> +	 .callback = force_skip_timer_override,
> +	 .ident = "HP NX6325 laptop",
> +	 .matches = {
> +		     DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "Hewlett-Packard"),
> +		     DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "HP Compaq nx6325"),
> +		     },
> +	 },
> +#endif
>  	{}
>  };
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/