linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] x86:Use cpu_khz for loops_per

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1214521834.3351.54.camel@promb-2n-dhcp368.eng.vmware.com>
Date:	Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:10:34 -0700
From:	Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
Cc:	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dan Hecht <dhecht@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86:Use cpu_khz for loops_per_jiffy calculation

On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 15:16 -0700, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > > > > Some cpus can do loop in cycle , some need two cycles, some need half.
> > > >
> > > > Hi Pavel,
> > > >
> > > > When you say loops per jiffies has nothing to do with khz, by khz you
> > > > mean the cpu frequency, right ?
> > >
> > > Yes.
> > >
> > > > AFAIU in calibrate_delay_direct too we measure the amount by which timer
> > > > has ticked until DELAY_CALIBRATION_TICKS amount of jiffies has passed.
> > > > So IMO the code there too assumes that there is one loop per timer
> > > > cycle ?
> > >
> > > On my machine, it reports:
> > >
> > > delay using timer specific routine.. 3661.98 BogoMIPS (lpj=7323971)
> > > ...
> > > Detected 1828.828 MHz processor.
> > >
> > > (/proc/cpuinfo)
> > > model name      : Genuine Intel(R) CPU           T2400  @ 1.83GHz
> > > ...
> > > cpu MHz         : 1000.000
> > How is it 1000 here ? shouldn't this be 1830.xx
> 
> cpufreq effect, I believe.
> 
> > > bogomips        : 3657.54
> > >
> > > So you'd break it by setting lpj (aka bogomips) to cpu_khz, right?
> >
> > We are not setting it to cpu_khz but to tsc_khz, i am assuming that in
> > this case tsc_khz will be different than cpu_khz. Can you please mail me
> > the full dmesg log.
> 
> Yes, but neither cpu_khz nor tsc_khz will be 3657 bogoMips, right?

Hi Pavel,

Thanks for the dmesg. The HZ value that you are using on this system is
250, right ?

If you note the calculations
> +     lpj = ((u64)tsc_khz * 1000);
> +     do_div(lpj, HZ);

We are dividing by HZ over here. So you are right in saying that tsc_khz
wont be equal to bogoMips but lpj_fine will surely be computed correct
since we do consider the HZ value.

Please let me know if you still have any doubts.
Or can i safely assume that you will ACK the patch ;-)

Thanks,
Alok



> 
> Anyway, here are my boot messages.
>                                                                 Pavel
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/