[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080626093338.FCF7.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 09:36:01 +0900
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
MinChan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Takenori Nagano <t-nagano@...jp.nec.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] prevent incorrect oom under split_lru
> > But if such emergency happen in embedded system, application can't be
> > executed for some time.
> > I am not sure how long time it take.
> > But In some application, schedule period is very important than memory
> > reclaim latency.
> >
> > Now, In your patch, when such emergency happen, it continue to reclaim
> > page until it will scan entire page of lru list.
> > It
>
> IMHO embedded real-time apps shoud mlockall() and not do anything that
> can result in memory allocations in their fast (deterministic) paths.
Indeed.
> The much more important case is desktop usage - that is where we run non
> real-time code, but do expect 'low' latency due to user-interaction.
>
> >From hitting swap on my 512M laptop (rather frequent occurance) I know
> we can do better here,..
nice suggestion.
thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists