linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for June 25

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200806260801.13131.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Thu, 26 Jun 2008 08:01:12 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 25

On Thursday, 26 of June 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 02:28:38 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> >
> > This tree is completely broken on my test box (x86-64 HP nx6325) and I can't
> > even bisect it. :-(
> 
> Config?

Attached.

> > It hits a NULL pointer dereference in find_symbol during boot, but when I tried
> > to bisect this issue, I hit another one that made the box hang solid during
> > boot (early, no messages available).
> > 
> > If things continue going this way, 2.6.27 will be a disaster ...
> 
> None of us want that.

Thanks,
Rafael

View attachment "next-config" of type "text/plain" (63766 bytes)