[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080627170514.7A88.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:08:22 +0900
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Suresh B Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vatsa <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n
Hi
> Advantages:
>
> * Enterprise workloads on large hardware configurations may need
> aggressive consolidation strategy
> * Performance impact on server is different from desktop or laptops.
> Interactivity is less of a concern on large enterprise servers while
> workload response times and performance per watt is more significant
> * Aggressive power savings even with marginal performance penalty is
> is a useful tunable for servers since it may provide good
> performance-per-watt at low utilisation
> * This tunable can influence other parts of scheduler like wakeup
> biasing for overall task consolidation
I'd like to know how many saving power.
if there are only small saving, I think this is not interesting feature.
Do you expect how many percentage saving?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists