linux-kernel - Re: Performance of ext4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:19:13 +0530
From:	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Mingming <cmm@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Holger Kiehl <Holger.Kiehl@....de>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Solofo.Ramangalahy@...l.net, Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@...com>,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Performance of ext4

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 02:44:59PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 05:46:39PM -0700, Mingming wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 09:09 +0000, Holger Kiehl wrote:
> > > On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Mingming wrote:
> > > 
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 21:12 +0000, Holger Kiehl wrote:
> > > >> Yes, with this patch applied on top of latest patch queue I no longer
> > > >> get truncated files, after running a short test. Tomorrow I will do some
> > > >> more thorough testing and use the patch you have send to me in a separate
> > > >> mail. The above patch did not apply but it was easy to apply by hand.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for quick response and test. I have updated the patch queue with
> > > > above patch merged. Please let me know if you still see apply issue and
> > > > file size update issue with current patch queue.
> > > >
> > > Thanks, it applies without any problems. However I still hit an oops. What
> > > I find strange is that I got the oops just as the benchmark is done and
> > > all process where shutting down. The same behaviour I reported here:
> > > http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0806.2/2113.html
> > > Only this time I got just one oops. This is on x86_64 system (4 Opteron CPU's
> > > and SW Raid 1+0). I have not seen this on my home system x86 (1 Dual Core
> > > and HW Raid). Anyway, here the dmesg output:
> > > 
> > > kjournald2 starting.  Commit interval 15 seconds
> > > EXT4 FS on md7, internal journal
> > > EXT4-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
> > > EXT4-fs: file extents enabled
> > > EXT4-fs: mballoc enabled
> > > JBD: barrier-based sync failed on md7 - disabling barriers
> > > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1667!
> > 
> > Did not get a chance to look more closely today, but it's point to this
> > code in ext4_da_writepage()
> > 
> >  page_bufs = page_buffers(page);
> > 
> > and appearently it's BUG_ON at 
> >  BUG_ON(!PagePrivate(page)); in page_buffers().
> > 
> > 
> 
> Ok so we are doing the journal_commit and meanwhile shrink_page_list
> dropped the buffer. I guess what is happening is
> 
> 
> journal_submit_inode_data_buffers
> generic_writepages
> write_cache_pages
> pagevec_lookup_tag(..PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY,..)
> foreach(page)
> 							shrink_page_list
> 							lock_page
> 							ext4_releasepage
> 							try_to_free_buffers
> 							drop_buffers
> 							cancel_dirty_page
> 							unlock_page
> lock_page()
> BUG_ON(!PagePrivate(page));
> 
> 
> How about the below ? 

or update write_cache_pages not to call writepage if the page is not
dirty ?


diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index ded57d5..0a13702 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -929,6 +929,11 @@ int write_cache_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
 				continue;
 			}
 
+			if (!PageDirty(page)) {
+				unlock_page(page);
+				continue;
+			}
+
 			ret = (*writepage)(page, wbc, data);
 
 			if (unlikely(ret == AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE)) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/