linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/30] SMP-group balancer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080627124630.GB14576@elte.hu>
Date:	Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:46:30 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/30] SMP-group balancer - take 3


* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Another go at SMP fairness for group scheduling.
> 
> This code needs some serious testing,..
> 
> However on my system performance doesn't tank as much as it used to. 
> I've ran sysbench and volanomark benchmarks.
> 
> The machine is a Quad core (Intel Q9450) with 4GB of RAM.
> Fedora9 - x86_64
> 
> sysbench-0.4.8 + postgresql-8.3.3
> volanomark-2.5.0.9 + openjdk-1.6.0
> 
> I've used cgroup group scheduling.

cool. I have applied your patches to a new temporary topic, 
tip/sched/devel.smp-group-balance. If that works out fine in testing 
then we can merge it back into sched/devel.

Thanks Peter,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/