| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4864E5A0.60804@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 22:05:36 +0900
From: Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Tomohiro Kusumi <kusumi.tomohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] e1000: make ioport free
This patch makes e1000 driver ioport-free.
This corrects behavior in probe function so as not to request ioport
resources as long as they are not really needed. This is based on the
ioport-free patch of e1000 driver from Auke Kok and Tomohiro Kusumi.
Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Kusumi <kusumi.tomohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com>
---
drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h | 4 +
drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
Index: netdev-2.6/drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h
===================================================================
--- netdev-2.6.orig/drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h
+++ netdev-2.6/drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h
@@ -342,6 +342,10 @@ struct e1000_adapter {
bool quad_port_a;
unsigned long flags;
u32 eeprom_wol;
+
+ /* for ioport free */
+ int bars;
+ int need_ioport;
};
enum e1000_state_t {
Index: netdev-2.6/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
===================================================================
--- netdev-2.6.orig/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
+++ netdev-2.6/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
@@ -872,6 +872,44 @@ static void e1000_dump_eeprom(struct e10
}
/**
+ * e1000_is_need_ioport - determine if an adapter needs ioport resources or not
+ * @pdev: PCI device information struct
+ *
+ * Returns true if an adapter needs ioport resources
+ **/
+
+static int
+e1000_is_need_ioport(struct pci_dev *pdev)
+{
+ switch (pdev->device) {
+ case E1000_DEV_ID_82540EM:
+ case E1000_DEV_ID_82540EM_LOM:
+ case E1000_DEV_ID_82540EP:
+ case E1000_DEV_ID_82540EP_LOM:
+ case E1000_DEV_ID_82540EP_LP:
+ case E1000_DEV_ID_82541EI:
+ case E1000_DEV_ID_82541EI_MOBILE:
+ case E1000_DEV_ID_82541ER_LOM:
+ case E1000_DEV_ID_82541ER:
+ case E1000_DEV_ID_82541GI:
+ case E1000_DEV_ID_82541GI_LF:
+ case E1000_DEV_ID_82541GI_MOBILE:
+ case E1000_DEV_ID_82544EI_COPPER:
+ case E1000_DEV_ID_82544EI_FIBER:
+ case E1000_DEV_ID_82544GC_COPPER:
+ case E1000_DEV_ID_82544GC_LOM:
+ case E1000_DEV_ID_82545EM_COPPER:
+ case E1000_DEV_ID_82545EM_FIBER:
+ case E1000_DEV_ID_82546EB_COPPER:
+ case E1000_DEV_ID_82546EB_FIBER:
+ case E1000_DEV_ID_82546EB_QUAD_COPPER:
+ return true;
+ default:
+ return false;
+ }
+}
+
+/**
* e1000_probe - Device Initialization Routine
* @pdev: PCI device information struct
* @ent: entry in e1000_pci_tbl
@@ -895,9 +933,19 @@ e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
int i, err, pci_using_dac;
u16 eeprom_data = 0;
u16 eeprom_apme_mask = E1000_EEPROM_APME;
+ int bars, need_ioport;
DECLARE_MAC_BUF(mac);
- if ((err = pci_enable_device(pdev)))
+ /* do not allocate ioport bars when not needed */
+ need_ioport = e1000_is_need_ioport(pdev);
+ if (need_ioport) {
+ bars = pci_select_bars(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_IO);
+ err = pci_enable_device(pdev);
+ } else {
+ bars = pci_select_bars(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM);
+ err = pci_enable_device_mem(pdev);
+ }
+ if (err)
return err;
if (!(err = pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_64BIT_MASK)) &&
@@ -912,7 +960,8 @@ e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
pci_using_dac = 0;
}
- if ((err = pci_request_regions(pdev, e1000_driver_name)))
+ err = pci_request_selected_regions(pdev, bars, e1000_driver_name);
+ if (err)
goto err_pci_reg;
pci_set_master(pdev);
@@ -930,6 +979,8 @@ e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
adapter->pdev = pdev;
adapter->hw.back = adapter;
adapter->msg_enable = (1 << debug) - 1;
+ adapter->bars = bars;
+ adapter->need_ioport = need_ioport;
err = -EIO;
adapter->hw.hw_addr = ioremap(pci_resource_start(pdev, BAR_0),
@@ -937,12 +988,15 @@ e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
if (!adapter->hw.hw_addr)
goto err_ioremap;
- for (i = BAR_1; i <= BAR_5; i++) {
- if (pci_resource_len(pdev, i) == 0)
- continue;
- if (pci_resource_flags(pdev, i) & IORESOURCE_IO) {
- adapter->hw.io_base = pci_resource_start(pdev, i);
- break;
+ if (adapter->need_ioport) {
+ for (i = BAR_1; i <= BAR_5; i++) {
+ if (pci_resource_len(pdev, i) == 0)
+ continue;
+ if (pci_resource_flags(pdev, i) & IORESOURCE_IO) {
+ adapter->hw.io_base =
+ pci_resource_start(pdev, i);
+ break;
+ }
}
}
@@ -1214,7 +1268,7 @@ err_sw_init:
err_ioremap:
free_netdev(netdev);
err_alloc_etherdev:
- pci_release_regions(pdev);
+ pci_release_selected_regions(pdev, bars);
err_pci_reg:
err_dma:
pci_disable_device(pdev);
@@ -1267,7 +1321,7 @@ e1000_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
iounmap(adapter->hw.hw_addr);
if (adapter->hw.flash_address)
iounmap(adapter->hw.flash_address);
- pci_release_regions(pdev);
+ pci_release_selected_regions(pdev, adapter->bars);
free_netdev(netdev);
@@ -5198,7 +5252,12 @@ e1000_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
pci_set_power_state(pdev, PCI_D0);
pci_restore_state(pdev);
- if ((err = pci_enable_device(pdev))) {
+
+ if (adapter->need_ioport)
+ err = pci_enable_device(pdev);
+ else
+ err = pci_enable_device_mem(pdev);
+ if (err) {
printk(KERN_ERR "e1000: Cannot enable PCI device from suspend\n");
return err;
}
@@ -5292,8 +5351,13 @@ static pci_ers_result_t e1000_io_slot_re
{
struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev->priv;
+ int err;
- if (pci_enable_device(pdev)) {
+ if (adapter->need_ioport)
+ err = pci_enable_device(pdev);
+ else
+ err = pci_enable_device_mem(pdev);
+ if (err) {
printk(KERN_ERR "e1000: Cannot re-enable PCI device after reset.\n");
return PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists