linux-kernel - Re: [xfs-masters] Re: linux-next: Tree for June 24 (XFS x2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080627132317.GB23854@lst.de>
Date:	Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:23:17 +0200
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:	xfs-masters@....sgi.com, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [xfs-masters] Re: linux-next: Tree for June 24 (XFS x2)

On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 10:37:51AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> What the hell happened here? Where's the commit title, description
> so this can be tracked back to a real patch?  That PV# is also bogus....
> 
> I suspect that it is this patch:
> 
> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00322.html
> 
> Which means that the Signed-Off-By list is incorrect as well as the original
> patch came from Christoph. This can't go to mainline like this - the commit log
> needs to be fixed up.

The tree is still messed up.  This original [XFS] commit is still there,
but also a revert of it.  but no patch with the actual changes again (?)

Also my patch to switch to the generic xattr code is attributed to
Lachlan and appears twice in the commit list.  I think this whole git
tree needs to be regenerated.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/