[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <477EA92C-D28C-4745-A805-387C359C51E8@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 08:48:33 -0500
From: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: joseph@...esourcery.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
libc-alpha@...rceware.org
Subject: Re: math-emu issue with fp divide
On Jun 12, 2008, at 11:24 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
> Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 08:38:44 -0500 (CDT)
>
>> Now that I'm digging into this a bit I'm thinking my issue has to
>> do with
>> the fix you put in place from back in Aug 2007 (commit
>> 405849610fd96b4f34cd1875c4c033228fea6c0f):
>>
>> [MATH-EMU]: Fix underflow exception reporting.
>>
>> 2) we ended up rounding back up to normal (this is the case where
>> we set the exponent to 1 and set the fraction to zero), this
>> should set inexact too
>> ...
>>
>> Another example, "0x0.0000000000001p-1022 / 16.0", should signal
>> both
>> inexact and underflow. The cpu implementations and ieee1754
>> literature is very clear about this. This is case #2 above.
>>
>> I'm not clear from your commit comment on what actual number
>> 0x0.0....01p-1022 is?
>
> I haven't been able to look closely at this yet but I think I
> happened to stumble over the test case that lead me to that
> changeset you are referencing here.
Have you had a chance to look at this?
- k
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists