[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4865147B.50202@goop.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:25:31 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Mark McLoughlin <markmc@...hat.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@...hat.com>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
Stephen Tweedie <sct@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for
64-bit Xen support
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> yeah, i guess so. Right now i only ran into the build failure so there's
> hope :) Here's a config that fails to build for sure:
>
> http://redhat.com/~mingo/misc/config-Fri_Jun_27_17_54_32_CEST_2008.bad
>
Will look at it shortly.
> note, on 32-bit there's a yet unfixed initrd corruption bug i've
> bisected back to:
>
> | 510be56adc4bb9fb229637a8e89268d987263614 is first bad commit
> | commit 510be56adc4bb9fb229637a8e89268d987263614
> | Author: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
> | Date: Tue Jun 24 04:10:47 2008 -0700
> |
> | x86: introduce init_memory_mapping for 32bit
>
> so if you see something like that it's probably not a bug introduced by
> your changes. (and maybe you'll see why the above commit is buggy, i
> havent figured it out yet)
Well, on a non-PSE system find_early_table_space() will not allocate
enough memory for ptes. But I posted the fix for that, and it's likely
you're using PSE anyway. Nothing pops out from a quick re-read, but it
could easily be mis-reserving the ramdisk memory or something.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists