[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48652C7F.1000904@qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:07:59 -0700
From: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, jarkao2@...pl,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: workqueue flush_work() patches
Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 06/27, Max Krasnyansky wrote:
>> I'm not sure if you guys saw my last email on this. So I'll restart the
>> thread.
>> If you guys are ok with the summary I provided below I can put all
>> Oleg's patches into some git tree, test them on my boxes and resend to
>> Andrew.
>
> I'll re-send these flush_work() patches to Andrew on Sunday,
Excellent. Feel free to include
Acked-By: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>
>> I was also going to go over the users of flush_queued_work() and
>> convert them to cancel_work_sync() and/or flush_work().
>
> I think this would be very nice in any case.
>
> but I don't think flush_work() will find a lot of users...
Well, you've already found one (schedule_on_each_cpu()) there will
probably be more. But I agree that flush is mostly used in cleanup
procedures and therefor most users just need cancel_work_sync().
Max
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists