linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 01/34] AMD IOMMU: add Kconfig entry

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6453C3CB8E2B3646B0D020C1126132730120C444@sausexmb4.amd.com>
Date:	Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:39:31 -0500
From:	"Duran, Leo" <leo.duran@....com>
To:	"Joerg Roedel" <joro@...tes.org>,
	"Muli Ben-Yehuda" <muli@...ibm.com>
Cc:	"Adrian Bunk" <bunk@...nel.org>,
	"Richter, Robert" <rrichter@...e.amd.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	"Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	"Biemueller, Sebastian" <Sebastian.Biemueller@....com>,
	<tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"Sarathy, Bhavna" <Bhavna.Sarathy@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 01/34] AMD IOMMU: add Kconfig entry

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote

> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 12:59:47PM -0400, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 06:54:30PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> >
> > > True. At least for the case without device isolation I have some
> > > optimizations in mind which will minimize the performance
> > > tradeoff. I hope to have them ready for 2.6.28 :)
> >
> > Do you mean the case where you have a single I/O address space which
> > is shared by all devices?
> 
> Yes. I think this will be the case used most when IOMMU is used for
> virtualization and to handle devices with limited DMA address ranges.
> In
> this case there is a lot to optimize.
> 

With the AMD IOMMU there are basically two options with regards to
(untranslated) DMA handling:
1) IOMMU will translate using page tables, which can be set on per
device-table-entry basis; sharing page tables between devices could be
considered a 'resource usage optimization', with the caveat of not being
to provide protection for devices sharing the page tables.

2) IOMMU will not translate if the exclusion range has been enabled, and
the DMA address falls inside that range.
The exclusion range can be enabled for specific devices, or for all
devices... Enabling the exclusion range can be considered a 'performance
optimization' (no table-walks), with the caveat of not being able to
provide protection for devices sharing the exclusion range (BTW, there's
a single exclusion address range per IOMMU).

Leo.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/