[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080627222931.GB7201@il.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:29:31 -0400
From: Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@...ibm.com>
To: "Duran, Leo" <leo.duran@....com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
"Richter, Robert" <rrichter@...e.amd.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"Biemueller, Sebastian" <Sebastian.Biemueller@....com>,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
"Sarathy, Bhavna" <Bhavna.Sarathy@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/34] AMD IOMMU: add Kconfig entry
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 03:39:31PM -0500, Duran, Leo wrote:
> 2) IOMMU will not translate if the exclusion range has been enabled, and
> the DMA address falls inside that range.
> The exclusion range can be enabled for specific devices, or for all
> devices... Enabling the exclusion range can be considered a 'performance
> optimization' (no table-walks), with the caveat of not being able to
> provide protection for devices sharing the exclusion range (BTW, there's
> a single exclusion address range per IOMMU).
So, if I understand this correctly, could we implement Joerg's
"almost-direct-map" by having 0-64MB translated for host-owned
devices, and then 64MB-end excluded (again, for host-owned devices
only)? If yes, it should provide a small boost in performance (may or
may not be measurable) over having 64MB-end be an identity
translation.
Cheers,
Muli
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists