[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48657636.8070208@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:22:30 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...nel.org>
To: Glauber Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/39] don't use word-size specifiers
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> I hate to say it, but I really think this is a step backwards in
> readability. Consistency is a good thing, and with the suffixes in
> place we are consistent between instructions that refer to memory and
> instructions that refer to registers. We also get one more check on
> things, where the assembler can tell the programmer he probably typoed.
>
> So I would prefer if we *didn't* go down this route, except for explicit
> unification, but that's not the case here (since the size is still
> explicit in the register names.)
>
Okay, I didn't really explain what I meant very well here...
Obviously, most of your patch series is all about unification, and that
is a Good Thing, and thank you for doing it. What I was trying to say
was that it is not obvious from just reading the patchset what changes
are necessary for unification, and which one are a stylistic change. If
*all* the changes are unification, please just say so and disregard this
remark, and I'll go ahead and apply your patchset.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists