[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080628145113.GA26878@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 16:51:13 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder@...radead.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
David Woodhouse <david.woodhouse@...el.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 26
* Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder@...radead.org> wrote:
> No, firmware is same.
>
> Our Firmware blob looks like this...
> u8 firmware_major
> u8 firmware_minor
> u8 firmware_fix
> u8 pad
> __be32 start_address
> __be32 length (total, including BSS sections to be zeroed)
> data... (in __be32 words, which is native for the firmware)
>
> rest of data is same and you can see it manually.
>
> I am surprise why Ingo is using hex dump and he finds different data.
>
> And I did not received any feedback from Ingo yet.
sorry - it was just a drive-by comment i made to Rafael while i reacted
to the x86 portion of his mail - i dont have this tg3 problem myself so
there's nothing i could report or test. I only looked at the patch that
was identified and the tg3FwText[] array appeared to be different - but
as you explain it above, that is OK and the firmware image is the same.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists