[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080628181145.60c55ea0@mjolnir.drzeus.cx>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:11:45 +0200
From: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-mmc@...eus.cx>
To: Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mmc: Add per-card debugfs support
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:36:37 +0200
Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com> wrote:
> Pierre Ossman <drzeus-mmc@...eus.cx> wrote:
> >
> > An alternative to sticking it into mmc.c is to create a debugfs.c that
> > contains all the uglyness. Debugging code isn't quite as important to
> > keep crystal clear.
>
> But if we're going to rely on gcc optimizing the whole thing away when
> debugfs is disabled, we must keep these buggers in the same file as its
> caller...
>
> Though I suppose an extra function call that does nothing at host and
> card registration time isn't a very high price to pay for cleaner code.
>
This is in the device addition/removal code as well. Hardly a hotpath.
--
-- Pierre Ossman
Linux kernel, MMC maintainer http://www.kernel.org
rdesktop, core developer http://www.rdesktop.org
WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the
Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption
for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end
encryption.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists