[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r6aip2pi.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 07:07:21 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: dougthompson@...ssion.com
Cc: bluesmoke-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/13] EDAC i5100 new intel chipset driver
dougthompson@...ssion.com writes:
>
> 2) I have not yet tackled the de-interleaving of the
> rank/controller address space into the physical address
> space of the CPU. There is nothing fundamentally missing,
> it is just ending up to be a lot of code, and I'd rather
> keep it separate for now, esp since it doesn't work yet...
>
> 3) The code depends on a particular i5100 chip select
> to DIMM mainboard chip select mapping. This mapping
> seems obvious to me in order to support dual and single
> ranked memory, but it is not unique and DIMM labels
> could be wrong on other mainboards. There is no way
> to query this mapping that I know of.
Since there's a non negligible probability that the output
of this driver is completely misleading because of (2) and (3)
and probably (4) too [reporting the wrong DIMMs etc.]
would it be possible to add some flag to EDAC that
warns the user that the output is not fully reliable?
-Andi (who can just see people replacing the wrong DIMMs and
then blaming Linux)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists