[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080629221217.GM29319@disturbed>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:12:17 +1000
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: xfs-masters@....sgi.com
Cc: Elias Oltmanns <eo@...ensachen.de>,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
David Chinner <dgc@....com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [xfs-masters] Re: freeze vs freezer
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 05:09:10PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Is this the same thing the per-device IO-queue-freeze patches for
> > >HDAPS also
> > > need to do? If so, you may want to talk to Elias Oltmanns
> > > <eo@...ensachen.de> about it. Added to CC.
> >
> > Thanks for the heads up Henrique. Even though these issues seem to be
> > related up to a certain degree, there probably are some important
> > differences. When suspending a system, the emphasis is on leaving the
> > system in a consistent state (think of journalled file systems), whereas
> > disk shock protection is mainly concerned with stopping I/O as soon as
> > possible. As yet, I cannot possibly say to what extend these two
> > concepts can be reconciled in the sense of sharing some common code.
>
> Actually, I believe requirements are same.
>
> 'don't do i/o in dangerous period'.
>
> swsusp will just do sync() before entering dangerous period. That
> provides consistent-enough state...
As I've said many times before - if the requirement is "don't do
I/O" then you have to freeze the filesystem. In no way does 'sync'
prevent filesystems from doing I/O.....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists